Dear AC,

Grace & Peace to YOU from God & Son Unlimited.

Selection of 12 apostles, and from many disciples, is significant. It not only shows partiality, but it's thought by some they were all twins.

When looking closer the 12 were as a hung jury. They could never agree on anything. James and John moved "the ten" to "indigantion". Peter denied him thrice, and did it twice. As for Judas, it says he "also betrayed him", indicating others did too; Not to mention "a little leaven leavens the whole" 12. Taking 3 up to the mount of transfiguration also showed partiality, which is not good nor Godly, as is noted oft from 2Chronicles to 1Peter.

So, neither the old 12 nor the new 12 were unleavened; And that is why when 120, who thought themselves better, selected Mathias to replace Judas, God chose Saul to become Paul: his witness unto all men, to shew us the "more excellent way" is neither broad nor narrow, but above and beyond both such, as Christ is "above" law vs law, and "seated" (not "standing" as Jesus in Acts 7:55). That is why Stephen, among the seven selected by the new twelve, got cast out and stoned to death. For Psalms clearly says "sit", not stand. And Saul of Saul-->Paul knew that, having being taught the law by Gamiliel at Jersualem, and become not only an Hebrew of Hebrews, but the most zealous of the Pharisees for law... til it blinded him enroute to Damascus.

Much like even Peter of Simon-->Peter is called Satan to told to get converted, it's not just a simple matter of Saul-->Paul; For even "Paul" felt wretched via another law, prior to flushing all law as dung and becoming Converted Paul The Apostle: his witness unto all men, that God our Saviour will have all men saved(graced) and all men aware what they're saved(delivered) from: the law. So in both cases, of Peter and Paul it's:

Law --> Another Law --> Grace void of Law
Simon --> Peter(Satan) --> Converted Peter
Saul --> Paul(Wretched) --> Converted Paul

But we know from Peter's writings he got converted by reading Paul's epistles; So Paul got converted first.

The GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

You just wrote:

"Taking 3 up to the mount of transfiguration also showed partiality, which is not good nor Godly,..."

So now Jesus is unfair and ungodly? I could say that someone is a no good peice of horse dung, but that would be giving them to much credit! I will just say someone is insane. I think after that remark you just made about Jesus, I will just flush someone's every worthless ass thought down the toilet like dung. You really are a waste of human flesh.

Dear AC,

Grace unto you, and peace,
from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

So then, you find partiality ok if Jesus does it?
I find, it's not good nor Godly: 2Chron...1Peter.
In fact, there's no partiality with Law or Grace.
By Law: all perish, none live.
Br Grace: all live, none perish.
Longsuffering to us-ward is no none perish.

The GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

Mr. Miles,
Really. Go stick your nose up Paul's rear end where it belongs. You do not follow Jesus. You do not know who Jesus is. Stop signing out by using His name. That is taking the name of the Lord in vain. Oh! that's right. I forget that you can not sin. So sorry!

The GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

Grace and Peace be unto ALL. No Exceptions!

Most interesting exchange.

On the one hand, the gift of LOVE, LIFE, and, LIBERTY, is shared openly and freely. This is clearly noticeable in no accusations and in no recognition of the assigned condemnation that is carried forth through law via the venue of religion. ALL religions. No exceptions!

(Scary for those bound by law, to the law, for the law. For what one hath bound self on earth to, one hath also bound thy self in heaven.)

While on the other hand, a clear demonstration of what religion has produced played its, "curse your God and die," taunting games. (Childishness, but understandable given the context of the world the child has given itself over too)

I appreciate the distinction in this thread of this forum, for it has clearly defined who's hope is within the context of LOVE, LIFE, and LIBERTY. And, who's hopelessness is within the context of the religious realm of Death, Decay, and Destruction.

Well said Christ-Daniel: Miles
Well done Christ-Daniel: Miles


Onlashuk