| Subject: |
|
Re: Wrongfully Convicted is proof law imperfect |
| Name: |
|
Daniel Miles |
| Date Posted: |
|
Oct 18, 07 - 9:24 AM |
| IP Address: |
|
216.197.240.105 |
| Email: |
|
approved@godshew.org |
| Website: |
|
http://www.godshew.org/Law.htm |
| Message: |
|
Grace unto you, and peace,
from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
The lastest wrongful conviction of the crown (law) is William Mullins, who notably got an apology from the crown which wrongfully convicted him; But said crown would not go as far as calling him innocent, nor disrobe and step down when it(law) was proven faulty.
http://www.cbc.ca/news_archives/20071015.jhtml
The wrongful convictions of Donald Marshall Jr., David Milgaard and Guy Paul Morin have spotlighted what many call the failure of the Canadian justice system... IN DEPTH (WRONG FULL CONVICTIONS)
http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/wrongfullyconvicted/
POINT: His Grace is neither Law Law nor Law vs Law.
Repeating Law(Wrong Full) is Law(Wrong) Law(Wrong).
Law vs Law is as Loser vs Loser both sides of vs.
http://www.godshew.org/Romans8.html
The GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
Forum
bravenet.com